The article attempts to theorize the provisions of international information (cyber) security. The rationale of the necessity of such theorization comes from the nature of international information relations and their global character. The difficulty lies in the phases of the process of informatization and its elements, namely the inability to imagine international information society. In this regard, the process of conduction the boundaries of the subject of international legal regulation is complicated.

The article presents the sources which are regulating international information.The main idea of the direction of international legal regulation should give priority to international information (cyber) security. The regulation of international information (cyber) security can not only create guarantees of protection for subjects of international law, but also guarantees for the further development of international information security. At the end of the article I gave the definition of the international information (cyber) security law. This article provides some considerable aspects of the ratification of the Rome statute of the International Criminal Court, which contributed to the adoption of the amendments to the Constitutions of several European countries. The Statute is an integral treaty, which can be signed and ratified by any state. Pci ethernet adapter. The necessity of creation of a system of international justice appeared long time ago.

But the most successful accomplishment of it was the adoption of the Rome statute of ICC in 1998 during the diplomatic conference. There are various aspects of the implementation of the Statute by state-members, which will be examined in this article. The article is devoted to the study of conceptual issues of the international legal regime of the protection of the intangible cultural heritage, which are poorly researched in the international legal science. First of all, the grounds (reasons) for the protection of the intangible cultural heritage are studied. There is an international legal analysis of such basic terms as 'cultural heritage', 'intangible cultural heritage', 'world heritage' and others. The correlation and interrelation of international legal regimes of the protection of the material cultural heritage and the intangible cultural heritage are considered. Also the article consider the problem of the 'belonging' of the cultural heritage, when such heritage can be regarded as belonging to certain communities, ethnic groups, etc., or when arise situation of 'appropriation' of such heritage, for example, by individuals or media corporations.

Among the issues of a conceptual nature, the article consider positive and negative aspects of the 'commercialization' of the intangible cultural heritage. In the nineties of the last century, it was considered that The Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was an international legal driver between Russia and the EU. PCA entered into the force in 1997. This Agreement establishes the base of legal cooperation in social, financial, economic and cultural areas. PCA does not specify interaction in regional security issues.

So, at the beginning of the 2000s, in changing realities came the comprehension that the PCA need to be modernized and its regulation area is to be enlarged. In strengthening and enhancing the effectiveness of the United Nations and such regional organizations as the OSCE and the Council of Europe, as well as in cases related to the establishment of regimes and treaties contributing the «safe world», cooperation of the Russia and EU was specified in the «road map» on the common space of external security. According to this «road map», it was planned to expand cooperation in the following priority areas: to strengthen the international cooperation against the terrorism, in non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) area, in the export control and disarmament areas, in the crisis management and civil protection spheres. It passed an approximately equal period since these two events. However, today we don’t have a new basic agreement and we don’t expect that it would be signed soon.